Background & Objective: Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise from adenomatous polyps, and clinical management of this type of polyp is highly dependent on the reliability and validity of the pathological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine the Interobserver agreement of five pathologists in assessing dysplasia in adenomatous polyps. Methods: In this study, a total of 146 adenomatous polyps of patients undergoing colonoscopy were selected from hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran between 2017 and 2018. Five pathologists independently classified adenomatous polyps according to histologic type, nuclear pseudostratification, mitotic activity, nuclear polarity, nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear shape, nucleolus, chromatin pattern, cytology grade, architectural features, dysplasia, and final diagnosis. The overall kappa statistic (k) was used to assess agreement among pathologists. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62. 06 ± 13. 06 (mean ± SD) with a male-to-female ratio of 2. 2: 1. The most common site of resection was the sigmoid colon (28. 1%). The highest agreement was found for dysplasia grade (k=0. 415) and histologic type (k=0. 401), whereas the lowest agreement was found for mitotic activity (k=0. 185), nuclear shape (k=0. 187), and nucleolus (k=0. 196). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that agreement among pathologists in assessing dysplasia in adenomatous polyps is within fair to moderate levels of agreement. Therefore, there is a vital need to better clarify the current diagnostic criteria.

Background: Varicocele is the collection of dilated veins of pampiniform plexus which is the most common cause of infertility occurred in 35-40% of infertile men. Despite all the diagnostic tools exist for varicocele diagnosis; still, a physical examination is the first step. Objective: This study was done to determine the inter-observer agreement on varicoceles diagnosis. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, two expert examiners evaluated 93 men with infertility, scrotal pain, and enlarged scrotum for the presence of varicocele. The urologists examined patients independently in two separate rooms. The inter-observer agreement on varicocele grading analyzed by the Spearman Rho correlation coefficient. Results: The grading of varicocele were similar in 34 (36. 5%) and 59 (63. 4%) cases in the left and right side, respectively with correlation coefficient of 0. 65 (0. 51-0. 75) and 0. 25 (0. 04-0. 43), respectively. It implies that inter-observer agreement was substantial for left varicocele assessment and moderate for right varicocele assessment. Conclusion: Physical exam is the essential diagnostic tool for varicocele. As long as the observers educated with the same standard method the disagreements reduced to the negligible extent.

Purpose: The main goal of this study was to assess the histopathological efficacy of renal mass biopsy and to check the concordance between pathological results and biopsy of the final specimen, as well as Interobserver variability in the assessment of biopsy cores. Materials and Methods: A hundred sets of core biopsies of postoperative specimens (renal masses) have been performed. Three core biopsies of the intact specimen had been performed once the kidney with the tumor, or the tumor alone were resected. The urologist aimed to obtain two cores from the peripheral sides of the tumor and one core from its center. The surgical specimen was evaluated by a single pathologist, whereas biopsy samples were referred to three independent pathologists who were blinded to the final results of the renal mass biopsy. Results: Nondiagnostic biopsy rates ranged from 13% to 22%. Sensitivity and specificity ranged 83-97% and 97-99% by excluding nondiagnostic results. The concordance between assessment of surgical specimen and biopsy in the Fuhrman grading system ranged 36. 5-77. 0%, respectively. Interobserver agreement between the three pathologists was substantial or moderate, depending on the tumor subtype. The Krippendorff's alpha coefficient, calculated by excluding the nondiagnostic results, was 0. 28 (moderate agreement) for the Fuhrman grading system. Conclusion: The agreement regarding grading of biopsies between three pathologists ranged from moderate to substantial. Therefore, a team of dedicated uropathologists should be engaged in final diagnosis of renal mass biopsy rather than single one before implementing the proper treatment.

Background: Inter-observer variability among pathologists' reports has been a significant challenge in the diagnosis of diseases, especially cancers. Designing a grading system with minimal inter-observer variability can help achieve more accurate diagnoses. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether the grading system proposed by Cheng and colleagues (Cheng’s grading system) can improve inter-observer variability among pathologists in grading urothelial cancer, compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system (2004/2016). Methods: Four pathologists examined all slides of bladder biopsy samples diagnosed as urothelial carcinoma, available in the archives of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran, from 2019 to 2022. Each pathologist reported the tumor grade based on both grading systems, independently of previous answers or the reports of their colleagues. Results: Of 132 samples, the majority were from men (84.1%); the mean age of patients was 66.56±11.31 years. For low and high grades of the WHO system and grade II in Cheng’s grading system, κ = 0.602; agreement was lower for grade III (κ = 0.439) and higher for grade IV (κ = 0.690) compared with the WHO grading system. There was significant agreement among the pathologists in all tumor characteristics, with excellent agreement for stromal invasion (κ = 0.790) and muscular invasion (κ = 0.884), fair to good agreement for WHO 2004/2016 grading (κ = 0.602) and Cheng’s grading (κ = 0.574) overall, and poor agreement for tumor heterogeneity (κ = 0.360). Conclusions: Both grading systems demonstrated favorable agreement among pathologists, without significant differences between the two systems. These results confirm the appropriateness of both grading systems.